Three women have filed a lawsuit against Google, accusing
the company of discriminating against female employees by underpaying
them and denying them opportunities for promotions. The plaintiffs seek
to turn their complaint into a class action lawsuit covering all women
who worked at Google within the last four years.
“Google has discriminated and continues to discriminate
against its female employees by systematically paying them lower
compensation than Google pays to male employees performing substantially
similar work under similar working conditions,” the lawsuit claims.
The suit was filed on behalf of three women — Kelly
Ellis, Holly Pease, and Kelli Wisuri — who say they were placed into
lower career tracks than their male co-workers and received lower
salaries and bonuses because of it. They assert that Google’s actions
violate California law, including the California Equal Pay Act, and are
asking for lost wages and damages, and for Google to be forced to
correct its allegedly discriminatory hiring practices.
Google denies the allegations. “In relation to this
particular lawsuit, we’ll review it in detail, but we disagree with the
central allegations,” Gina Scigliano, senior manager of corporate
communications at Google, writes in an emailed statement. Scigliano also
says that Google has “extensive systems in place to ensure that we pay
fairly.”
This lawsuit is far from the first claim of gender-based pay discrimination at Google. The US Department of Labor is currently investigating
the company’s hiring practices and, earlier this year, testified in
court that it found “systemic compensation disparities against women
pretty much across the entire workforce.” Earlier this month, The New York Times published salary data, compiled by nearly 1,200 Google employees, showing disparities in both salaries and bonuses across pay grades.
Much of the lawsuit revolves around Google’s tiered pay system.
Employees on higher tiers typically receive higher salaries and bonuses.
“Technical” employees also receive more pay than “non-technical”
employees.
0 comments:
Post a Comment